Business Unusual

Should a machine be allowed to use lethal force?

Micah Johnson is considered to be the first person killed by US police using a remote controlled device. The robot was a bomb disposal unit that police loaded with explosive and detonated near him.

It may be the first time it was done; it will not be the last. The question is under what circumstances could this be allowed and who should make the rules.

The much anticipated 4th Industrial Revolution has often been said to result in the loss of jobs; it is fair to say it will also lead to the loss of life.

Bizarrely, the morality on the use of robots appears as much part of science-fiction as anything else with Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws from his short story Runaround.

  • A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  • A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  • A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

That did not preclude robots from using lethal force though. Early versions have existed for decades to protect ships from missile attacks. The Lethal Autonomous Weapons, ironically known as LAWS, are far more accurate and dependable than humans at shooting down incoming missiles. Israel uses the Iron Dome system to stop rockets fired on populated areas and South Korea has remotely operated sentry guns along their border with North Korea. The sentry guns first broadcast a warning and require a human operator to actually fire, although they can operate on their own.

The illustrates the three Ds of robotics for ideal use:

  • Dangerous situations
  • Dirty operations
  • Dull repetitive work

The word itself comes from the Slavic languages in which robata were serfs required to work for a certain period of the year for their landlords. In many ways it fits for the work humanity expects from their mechanical descendants.

There are two considerations for when robots would be allowed to use lethal force against humans.

Would the technology be good enough to consider all the options a trained and responsible human would?

Could humanity ethically allow a machine to take a life?

The technology will improve to allow the first part to be satisfied although it will be some time before it could be done with confidence. The Tesla crash in May appears to be as a result of the car's cameras not being able to see the truck it crashed into.

The second even humans struggle with, let alone know how get a machine to determine it.

To illustrate the basic issue consider the Trolley problem. Four scenarios to determine what you would do to avert someone being killed including an option when actively killing one person would spare you killing others.

Driverless car makers are wrestling with what a car should do if placed in a situation that would save others by killing you.

Then there is the issue that, with robots being used for safety work and surveillance, they would then be best placed to react to the situation, especially if others are in harm's way. The use of military surveillance drones to become attack drones followed this path. Some argue that if poor weather or signal jamming might affect the remote control of the drone, a scenario should exist to allow the mission to continue autonomously.

When the next steps are seemingly so close together we are likely to find ourselves having the ability to kill before we have resolved if we should be willing to do so.

The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots hopes to prevent it ever getting to that. At a meeting last year over 1000 experts - including Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk - signed a letter warning that machines should not be allowed to use lethal force.

But perhaps there are scenarios that robots should be allowed to overrule an operator. Consider an aircraft that is made to perform an operation by a pilot that would cause the plane to crash - The German Wings flight 9525 that was intentionally flown into a mountain in a suicide/murder that killed 144. Should aircraft allow operators to do this? In an attempt to make flight more safe, pilots are required to do so little that some argue that in an emergency situation they would not be able to deal with it.

These are serious considerations that are not decades away. Citizens could defer to experts, although it would be best if most were more informed and offer a view of how they would like to imagine a future for themselves and their children.

Read More
How the symbol for a good idea has outlived the product that inspired it

How the symbol for a good idea has outlived the product that inspired it

The history of General Electric is the history of electric lighting and after 125 years they may be selling it.

5 year-olds may never get a car licence

5 year-olds may never get a car licence

Cars might not only be autonomous by 2030, new drivers will probably not be allowed to drive.

The best way to listen to music is to hire it

The best way to listen to music is to hire it

The industry noted for being significantly disrupted by technology is getting its groove back.

Working from home or from the office, which is best?

Working from home or from the office, which is best?

We tend to have strong views on whether people should work in offices or remotely. This will help you decide.

Who should be allowed access to your encrypted data?

Who should be allowed access to your encrypted data?

There are growing calls for governments to be given access to people’s data. Is that fair?

Humans will be returning to the moon, but how will they be fed?

Humans will be returning to the moon, but how will they be fed?

The space race has typically focused on the massive rockets needed to get there, now we need to ensure there is enough to eat.

Popular articles
President Zuma is stalling on signing FICA bill  - and it remains a mystery why

President Zuma is stalling on signing FICA bill - and it remains a mystery why

EWN Parliament correspondent, Gaye Davis says it is still unclear why the President hasn't signed the FICA bill.

Sea Point's Mojo Market opens for business on Thursday

Sea Point's Mojo Market opens for business on Thursday

A new lifestyle market is set to open in Sea Point, offering a variety of food, art, fashion and entertainment seven days a week.

Judge Desai visits van Breda home on day 2 of triple murder trial

Judge Desai visits van Breda home on day 2 of triple murder trial

During the van Breda home visit State prosecutor Susan Galloway described to the judge where the murder weapon was found.

Caller berates black staff, says employers not obliged to provide transport

Caller berates black staff, says employers not obliged to provide transport

The caller from Bedfordview responds to complaints around the lack of late night transport provisions for Virgin Active workers.

Johnny Clegg announces his final tour

Johnny Clegg announces his final tour

The legendary superstar who has given South African music a voice, is giving his fans one last hoorah.

Economist explains why Rand strengthens despite junk status

Economist explains why Rand strengthens despite junk status

Economist at Nebank, Isaac Matshego, explains why the Rand has strengthened over the past few days.

No jobs for medical interns as health dept funds dry up - Sama

No jobs for medical interns as health dept funds dry up - Sama

Mark Sonderup, South Africa Medical Association, vice-chairperson says the medical profession is in trouble.

[Watch] All the Foreshore Freeway Project proposals

[Watch] All the Foreshore Freeway Project proposals

Take a look at the 6 six proposals that have been received by the City for the Foreshore freeway precinct.