The Right2Know Campaign plans to lodge a formal complaint with the Public Protector over allegations that MultiChoice paid off the SABC to support its bid for unencrypted set-top boxes.
Minutes of a 2013 meeting were revealed this week, suggesting the TV service paid the public broadcaster R100 million for its 24-hour news channel in exchange for political influence over digital migration.
Right to Know says it will also ask Parliament’s communications committee to launch an inquiry into payments MultiChoice made to both the SABC and ANN7.
Multichoice have denied the claims.
Koketso Sachane, standing in for Eusebius Mckaiser, spoke to Glenda Neville, editor of Media Online and Mhlobo Gunguluzi from the Right2Know Campaign.
Multchoice has used it's monopoly capital intensity and in so doing they have put in money into ANN7 and Sabc so that they can control the DTT itself. We want to take this to the Public Protector so that they can investigate this and tell people what has been happening— Mhlobo Gunguluzi, Right2Know Campaign spokesperson
The deadlines of the DTT have been missed and now we have a new one, and I think we are going to miss it too because of the shenanigans that are taking place.— Mhlobo Gunguluzi, Right2Know Campaign spokesperson
Neville explains how the unencryption of set-top boxes will inevitably change the broadcasting media landscape.
The landscape is changing and while these big SABCs, ANN7s and ETVs are fighting, the technology is taking place where we actually get our stuff on demand. Our biggest problem is the data costs. We have got to get that right, because that is going to liberate broadcasting and democratise content.— Glenda Neville, Editor of Media Online
Click on the link below to listen to the full discussion...
This article first appeared on 702 : [LISTEN] Making sense of MultiChoice and Gupta conundrum